Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2000
Relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation when administration is prolonged.
Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The topical study of inhaled drug (salbutamol) delivery in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Respiratory research · 2018Trial
- Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs following inhalation from dry powder inhaler formulations containing drug substance manufactured by supercritical fluids and micronization.Pharmaceutical research · 2007Trial
- Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs and systemic circulation following nebulization.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2002Trial
- The Advanced Integrated Respiratory (AIR) Model: Comparative Analysis of Salbutamol Sulphate Deposition from pMDI, DPI, and Nebuliser Versus the NGI.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsUrinary salbutamol post-inhalation has been shown to be an index of lung deposition. The possibility of using the urinary method for prolonged periods of inhalation (such as nebulized therapy) has been evaluated.
methodsOn separate study days volunteers received salbutamol 5 x 100 microg via either oral administration (ORAL), oral with 5 g oral charcoal (ORAL + C), inhaled from a metered dose inhaler (MDI) or MDI plus 5 g oral charcoal (MDI + C). Each dose was separated by 2 min, i.e. administration time of 8 min. Urine samples were provided at 0, 30, 40, 60 and 120 min postdose. Also seven subjects inhaled 5x100 microg doses from the MDI on five separate occasions and provided urine 0-30 min post dose.
resultsNo salbutamol was detected in urine samples following ORAL + C. The mean (s.d.) amounts of salbutamol excreted in the urine in the first 30 min post ORAL, MDI and MDI + C were 0.42 (0.55), 11.01 (3.77) and 11.60 (3.68) microg, respectively. The ratio of urinary salbutamol following MDI and MDI + C to ORAL in the 0-30 min collection period was 26.2 and 27.8, and between 30 and 40 min postdose was 5.1 and 4.7, respectively. There was no difference between urinary salbutamol over the first 30 min following MDI and MDI + C with a mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of 95.6 (84.0, 107.2). The mean (s.d.) coefficient of variation for the 30 min urinary salbutamol elimination following inhalation of 5 x 100 microg doses from the MDI by seven subjects (on 5 separate study days) was 9.4 (2.3)%.
conclusionsThe 30 min urinary salbutamol method can be used for an inhalation period of up to 8 min to identify the relative bioavailability to the lung. Samples taken after this time period are affected by excretion of the oral absorbed fraction. Most nebulisers deliver their dose within this administration time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.