Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10970022›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and behavioral physiology

Possible molecular-cellular mechanisms of the regulation of gene expression during learning.

L N Grinkevich, G V Vasil'ev

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and behavioral physiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L N GrinkevichIP Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg.
G V Vasil'ev
Pavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is an analysis of the regulatory mechanisms of plasticity. The first part provides a short review of the role of DNA-binding transcription factors in possible regulatory pathways and their activity in the mechanisms of plasticity. Our own data obtained in studies of the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of conditioned defensive reflexes in Helix are then presented. These studies show that formation of defensive types of plasticity in Helix is accompanied by serotonin-induced translocation of a protein with Rf 0.58 and increases in G-protein activity, protein kinase A activity, and expression of the c-fos gene. Transcription factors CRE and AP-1 probably have roles in the learning process. Gel shift assays demonstrated the existence of transcription factors of the CRE and AP-1 families in adult snails. In juvenile snails, which were unable to form defensive types of plasticity, the serotonin protein with Rf 0.58 (the learning "marker") was absent from and was not induced in the CNS. Gel shift assay results also showed that transcription factors of the AP-1 family were not present and were not induced by serotonin or the protein kinase A activator forskolin, though these snails had significant levels of CRE transcription factors. Serotonin and forskolin increased the DNA-binding activity of CRE in juvenile Helix. The lack of activity of transcription factors of the AP-1 family in juvenile snails may explain their inability to development sensitization and conditioned defensive reflexes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain ChemistryGene ExpressionHumansLearningNeuronal PlasticityTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID10970022
OpenAlexW1993291568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.