Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10969012›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2000

The smooth muscle cross-bridge cycle studied using sinusoidal length perturbations.

A Y Rhee, F V Brozovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Measuring Arterial Stiffness in Animal Experimental Studies.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Force suppression and the crossbridge cycle in swine carotid artery.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2007
    Article
  8. Regulation of the smooth muscle contractile phenotype by nonmuscle myosin.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2007
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A Y RheeDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4970 USA.
F V Brozovich

Funding

CLEVELAND TRAINING PROGRAM IN CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCHT32HL007653 · NHLBI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DUBYAK, GEORGE R · 1988 to 2008
$3.5M
REGULATION OF VASCULAR SMOOTH MUSCLE CONTRACTIONR01HL044181 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC · PI BROZOVICH, FRANK V · 1997 to 2005
$2.0M
REGULATION OF VASCULAR SMOOTH MUSCLE CONTRACTIONR29HL044181 · NHLBI · GRADUATE HOSPITAL (PHILADELPHIA) · PI BROZOVICH, FRANK V · 1990 to 1994
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL44181NHLBI NIH HHS T32HL07653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical characteristics of smooth muscle can be broadly defined as either phasic, or fast contracting, and tonic, or slow contracting (, Pharmacol. Rev. 20:197-272). To determine if differences in the cross-bridge cycle and/or distribution of the cross-bridge states could contribute to differences in the mechanical properties of smooth muscle, we determined force and stiffness as a function of frequency in Triton-permeabilized strips of rabbit portal vein (phasic) and aorta (tonic). Permeabilized muscle strips were mounted between a piezoelectric length driver and a piezoresistive force transducer. Muscle length was oscillated from 1 to 100 Hz, and the stiffness was determined as a function of frequency from the resulting force response. During calcium activation (pCa 4, 5 mM MgATP), force and stiffness increased to steady-state levels consistent with the attachment of actively cycling cross-bridges. In smooth muscle, because the cross-bridge states involved in force production have yet to be elucidated, the effects of elevation of inorganic phosphate (P(i)) and MgADP on steady-state force and stiffness were examined. When portal vein strips were transferred from activating solution (pCa 4, 5 mM MgATP) to activating solution with 12 mM P(i), force and stiffness decreased proportionally, suggesting that cross-bridge attachment is associated with P(i) release. For the aorta, elevating P(i) decreased force more than stiffness, suggesting the existence of an attached, low-force actin-myosin-ADP- P(i) state. When portal vein strips were transferred from activating solution (pCa 4, 5 mM MgATP) to activating solution with 5 mM MgADP, force remained relatively constant, while stiffness decreased approximately 50%. For the aorta, elevating MgADP decreased force and stiffness proportionally, suggesting for tonic smooth muscle that a significant portion of force production is associated with ADP release. These data suggest that in the portal vein, force is produced either concurrently with or after P(i) release but before MgADP release, whereas in aorta, MgADP release is associated with a portion of the cross-bridge powerstroke. These differences in cross-bridge properties could contribute to the mechanical differences in properties of phasic and tonic smooth muscle.

Indexed as

ActinsAdenosine DiphosphateAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsAortaCalciumIn Vitro TechniquesMuscle ContractionMuscle, Smooth, VascularMyosinsPhosphatesPortal VeinRabbitsActinsAdenosine DiphosphateAdenosine TriphosphateCalciumMyosinsPhosphates

Identifiers

PMID10969012
PMCPMC1301044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.