Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10968778›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2000

Hypervariable sites in the mtDNA control region are mutational hotspots.

M Stoneking

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Spectrum and Impact of Mitochondrial DNA Mutations in Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nuclear genetic control of mtDNA copy number and heteroplasmy in humans.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M StonekingMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. stoneking@eva.mpg.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypervariable sites in human mtDNA are readily identified in evolutionary studies and are usually assumed to represent mutational hotspots. Recently, an alternative hypothesis was proposed that holds that hypervariable sites may instead reflect ancient mtDNA mutations that have been "shuffled" among different lineages via recombination. These hypotheses can be tested by examining the evolutionary rates for sites at which new mtDNA mutations are observed; if hypervariable sites are mutational hotspots, then newly arisen mtDNA mutations should occur preferentially at hypervariable sites. Results of this study show that both germline and somatic mtDNA mutations occur preferentially at hypervariable sites, which supports the view that hypervariable sites are indeed mutational hotspots.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularModels, GeneticCell LineageDNA, MitochondrialDNA ReplicationGene FrequencyGenetic VariationGerm-Line MutationHumansKineticsMutagenesisMutationNeoplasmsRecombination, GeneticRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID10968778
PMCPMC1287875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.