Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10958589›Full record

ReviewInvestigational new drugs2000

Development of multidrug-resistance convertors: sense or nonsense?

L van Zuylen, K Nooter, A Sparreboom, J Verweij

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Investigational new drugs, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Overcoming multidrug resistance of small-molecule therapeutics through conjugation with releasable octaarginine transporters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L van ZuylenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek) and University Hospital, The Netherlands. zuylen@onch.azr.nl
K Nooter
A Sparreboom
J Verweij
Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review describes the clinical relevance of the two drug transporters P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) and the in vitro phenomenon which is referred to as multidrug resistance (MDR). The attempts to try to block these resistance mechanisms are summarized with specific attention for the intentionally designed "second generation" MDR-convertors. Potential explanations of the limited clinical success rate are given and recommendations for the design of future studies provided.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsDrug Resistance, MultipleTetrahydroisoquinolinesAcridinesAnimalsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1CyclosporinsHumansIsoquinolinesPiperidinesPyridinesSerine EndopeptidasesAcridinesATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Bacterial ProteinsbiricodarBSase protein, Bacillus subtilisCyclosporinsElacridarIsoquinolinesPiperidinesPyridinesSerine EndopeptidasesTetrahydroisoquinolinesvalspodar

Identifiers

PMID10958589
OpenAlexW187648465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.