ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2000
Lifestyle health risk assessment. Do recently trained family physicians do it better?
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors influencing the implementation of screening and brief interventions for alcohol use in primary care practices: a systematic review using the COM-B system and Theoretical Domains Framework.Implementation science : IS · 2021Pooled it
- Stakeholder Views on Solutions to Improve Health System Performance.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2018Article
- Medical students' attention to multiple risk behaviors: a standardized patient examination.Journal of general internal medicine · 2012Article
- Conversant or clueless? Chlamydia-related knowledge and practice of general practitioners in Western Australia.BMC family practice · 2008Article
- Violence involving intimate partners: prevalence in Canadian family practice.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2007Article
- Impact of a brief training on medical resident screening for alcohol misuse and illicit drug use.The American journal on addictionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether recently trained family physicians were more likely to routinely assess lifestyle health risks during general medical evaluations. To document physicians' perceptions of the difficulties of lifestyle risk assessment, of medical training in that area, and of how often they saw patients with lifestyle health risks.
designAnonymous mailed survey conducted in 1995.
settingFamily practices in the province of Quebec.
participantsStratified random sample of 805 active family physicians of 1111 surveyed; 25 were ineligible or could not be located, and 281 did not respond (74.1% response rate).
main outcome measuresProportion of physicians graduating before and after 1989 who reported routinely (with 90% or more of their patients) assessing their adult and adolescent patients during general medical evaluations for substance use, sexual risk behaviours, and history of family violence and sexual abuse.
resultsExcept for asking about drug use, recently trained family physicians did not report better assessment of lifestyle health risks during general medical examinations than family physicians who graduated more than 10 years ago did. In both groups, routine assessment averaged 82% for tobacco use, 68% for alcohol consumption, and 20% to 40% for sexual risk behaviours. Screening for family violence and sexual abuse was rare, but more frequently reported by older women physicians. Only 20% to 40% of recent graduates rated their medical training adequate for evaluating illicit drug use, family violence, and sexual abuse.
conclusionRecently trained family physicians do not assess most lifestyle risk factors any better than their more experienced colleagues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10955180PMC2144772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.