Limitations of models used to examine the influence of nutrition during pregnancy and adult disease.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Critical and Sensitive Periods in Development and Nutrition.Annals of nutrition & metabolism · 2019
   Review
2. Premature Brain Aging in Baboons Resulting from Moderate Fetal Undernutrition.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2017
   Article
3. Poor nutrition during pregnancy and lactation negatively affects neurodevelopment of the offspring: evidence from a translational primate model.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2013
   Article
4. The use of digit ratios as markers for perinatal androgen action.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2006
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as