ArticleOncogene2000
A different function for a critical tryptophan in c-Raf and Hck.
Article in Oncogene, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combination of midostaurin and ATRA exerts dose-dependent dual effects on acute myeloid leukemia cells with wild type FLT3.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Cleavage Alters the Molecular Determinants of Protein Kinase C-δ Catalytic Activity.Molecular and cellular biology · 2017Article
- Dynamics-Driven Allostery in Protein Kinases.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2015Review
- Comparative surface geometry of the protein kinase family.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2009Article
- Signaling properties of a non-metazoan Src kinase and the evolutionary history of Src negative regulation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2008Article
- Role of the Brk SH3 domain in substrate recognition.Oncogene · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The similarity of the catalytic domains of Raf and Src family members suggests that functions of homologous residues may be similar in both kinase families. A tryptophan residue, W260, in the WEI region of the Src family kinase Hck has an important role in regulating ATP binding. We tested the hypothesis that the tryptophan, W342, in the WEI region of c-Raf may have a similar role to the W260 of Hck. Mutation of W260 to A in Hck activates kinase activity, but we found that mutation of W342 to A in c-Raf inactivates the kinase activity. Mutating W342 to aspartate (D), lysine (K) or histidine (H) also inactivated c-Raf whether assayed as a purified immunoprecipitate or when recruited to the plasma membrane. A constitutively active c-Raf can be generated by mutating two regulatory tyrosines to aspartate. When placed into this active c-Raf mutant, mutation of W342 to D, K or H enabled phosphorylation and activation of the c-Raf substrate MEK at the plasma membrane but not in an immunoprecipitation assay. We conclude that (1) Tryptophan has a different role in the WEI regions of c-Raf and Hck, (2) W342 is not directly involved in MEK binding as both positive and negative residues at 342 are permissive for MEK activation at the membrane in a constitutively active c-Raf mutant, (3) Factors at the membrane are capable of potentiating activation of c-Raf containing mutated W342 in a hyperactivated c-Raf, but not in a wild type c-Raf and (4) There is a stringent structural requirement for W at residue 342 in c-Raf.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.