Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10948031›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)

Consultation patterns and provision of contraception in general practice before teenage pregnancy: case-control study.

D Churchill, J Allen, M Pringle, J Hippisley-Cox, D Ebdon, M Macpherson, S Bradley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Parents are an untapped resource in sex education.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D ChurchillDivision of General Practice, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. dick.churchill@nottingham.ac.uk
J Allen
M Pringle
J Hippisley-Cox
D Ebdon
M Macpherson
S Bradley
Queen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine patterns of consultation in general practice and provision of contraception before teenage pregnancy.

designCase-control study, with retrospective analysis of case notes.

setting14 general practices in Trent region. SUBJECTS: 240 registered patients (cases) with a recorded conception before the age of 20. Three controls per case were matched by age and practice.

main outcome measuresConsultations in general practice and provision of contraception in the 12 months before conception and recorded provision of contraception at any time before conception.

resultsOverall, 223 cases (93%) had consulted a health professional at least once in the year before conception, 171 (71%) had discussed contraception in this time, and 121 (50%) had been prescribed oral contraception. Cases were more likely to have consulted in the year before conception than controls (odds ratio 2. 70, 95% confidence interval 1.56 to 4.66). Most of the difference was owing to consultation for contraception. Overall, 53 cases (22%) resulted in a termination of pregnancy. Cases whose pregnancy ended in a termination were more likely to have received emergency contraception than either their controls (3.21, 1.32 to 7.79) or cases resulting in other outcomes (3.01, 1.06 to 8.51).

conclusionsMost teenagers who became pregnant attended general practice in the year before pregnancy, and many had sought contraceptive advice. The reluctance of teenagers to attend general practice for contraception may be less than previously supposed. The association between provision of emergency contraception and pregnancy ending in termination emphasises the need for continuing follow up of teenagers consulting for this form of contraception.

Indexed as

ContraceptionAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceCase-Control StudiesDelivery of Health CareFamily PracticeFemaleHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomAdolescent PregnancyCase Control StudiesContraceptionContraceptive AgentsContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Agents, PostcoitalDelivery Of Health CareDemographic FactorsDeveloped CountriesEuropeFamily PlanningFamily Planning ProgramsFertilityFertility Control, PostcoitalFertility MeasurementsHealthHealth ServicesNorthern EuropePopulationPopulation DynamicsPregnancy RateReproductive BehaviorResearch MethodologyResearch ReportStudiesUnited KingdomUtilization Of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID10948031
PMCPMC27465
OpenAlexW1989805451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.