Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10944202›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2000

Building a dictionary for genomes: identification of presumptive regulatory sites by statistical analysis.

H J Bussemaker, H Li, E D Siggia

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 258 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MicrosatNavigator: exploring nonrandom distribution and lineage-specificity of microsatellite repeat motifs on vertebrate sex chromosomes across 186 whole genomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Computational design of probes to detect bacterial genomes by multivalent binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. On the unsupervised analysis of domain-specific Chinese texts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Profile of Eric D. Siggia. Interview by Farooq Ahmed.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  15. CLARE: Cracking the LAnguage of Regulatory Elements.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H J BussemakerCenter for Studies in Physics and Biology, The Rockefeller University, Box 25, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
H Li
E D Siggia
Rockefeller University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of complete genome sequences and mRNA expression data for all genes creates new opportunities and challenges for identifying DNA sequence motifs that control gene expression. An algorithm, "MobyDick," is presented that decomposes a set of DNA sequences into the most probable dictionary of motifs or words. This method is applicable to any set of DNA sequences: for example, all upstream regions in a genome or all genes expressed under certain conditions. Identification of words is based on a probabilistic segmentation model in which the significance of longer words is deduced from the frequency of shorter ones of various lengths, eliminating the need for a separate set of reference data to define probabilities. We have built a dictionary with 1,200 words for the 6, 000 upstream regulatory regions in the yeast genome; the 500 most significant words (some with as few as 10 copies in all of the upstream regions) match 114 of 443 experimentally determined sites (a significance level of 18 standard deviations). When analyzing all of the genes up-regulated during sporulation as a group, we find many motifs in addition to the few previously identified by analyzing the subclusters individually to the expression subclusters. Applying MobyDick to the genes derepressed when the general repressor Tup1 is deleted, we find known as well as putative binding sites for its regulatory partners.

Indexed as

Databases as TopicGenomeModels, GeneticAlgorithmsBase SequenceConsensus SequenceModels, StatisticalMolecular Sequence DataMonte Carlo MethodRNA, MessengerTranscription, GeneticRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID10944202
PMCPMC27717
OpenAlexW2005244073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.