Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10942455›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2000

Social and gender variation in the prevalence, presentation and general practitioner provisional diagnosis of chest pain.

H Richards, A McConnachie, C Morrison, K Murray, G Watt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01164371 (Gender Differences in the Development and Prognosis of Coronary Disease Where Initial Disease Manifestation is Stable Angina, Myocardial Infarction or Unheralded Coronary Death), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01164371 completednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Gender Differences in the Development and Prognosis of Coronary Disease Where Initial Disease Manifestation is Stable Angina, Myocardial Infarction or Unheralded Coronary Death: A CALIBER Study Using Linked GPRD-MINAP Data

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2010 to 2013Enrolled1,758,584ConditionsCoronary Disease, Cardiovascular Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Chest pain and subsequent consultation for coronary heart disease: a prospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Increased mortality among women with Rose angina who have not presented with ischaemic heart disease.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H RichardsDepartment of General Practice, University of Glasgow, 4 Lancaster Crescent, Glasgow G12 ORR. hmr3r@clinmed.gla.ac.uk
A McConnachie
C Morrison
K Murray
G Watt
University of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the prevalence of Rose angina and non-exertional chest pain in men and women in socioeconomically contrasting areas; to describe the proportions of men and women who present with the symptom of chest pain and who receive a provisional general practitioner diagnosis of coronary heart disease; to assess the effects of gender and deprivation.

designTwo random general population samples in socially contrasting areas were surveyed using the Rose angina questionnaire: the case notes of people identified with chest pain were reviewed.

settingGlasgow conurbation.

participants1107 men and women, aged 45-64, with chest pain. OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of Rose angina and non-exertional chest pain; the proportions who had presented with chest pain and received a general practitioner's provisional diagnosis of coronary heart disease.

resultsThere was no difference between social groups in the prevalence of all chest pain but a greater proportion of those in deprived groups had Rose angina and a greater proportion of these had the more severe grade. The proportion of people who had presented with chest pain was higher among socioeconomically deprived groups but there was no difference in the proportions receiving a general practitioner provisional diagnosis of coronary heart disease. Men were more likely to present with chest pain than women and were more likely to receive a provisional general practitioner diagnosis of coronary heart disease.

conclusionsNo evidence was found of social differences in patient presentation or general practitioner diagnosis that might explain reported variations in uptake of cardiology services. In contrast, gender variation may originate in part from differences in patient presentation and general practitioner diagnosis. Further investigation of socioeconomic variations in uptake of cardiology services should focus later in the care pathway, on general practitioner referral patterns and clinical decisions taken in secondary care.

Indexed as

Age DistributionAngina PectorisChest PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPrevalenceScotlandSex DistributionSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID10942455
PMCPMC1731754
OpenAlexW2053491568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.