Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10942228›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2000

Low-dose cytarabine maintenance therapy vs observation after remission induction in advanced acute myeloid leukemia: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial (E5483).

C Robles, K M Kim, M M Oken, J M Bennett, L Letendre, P H Wiernik, M J O'Connell, P A Cassileth

Abstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Maintenance Therapy in AML.Frontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

C RoblesUniversity of Miami School of Medicine, FL, USA.
K M Kim
M M Oken
J M Bennett
L Letendre
P H Wiernik
M J O'Connell
P A Cassileth
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Miami · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

PROVIDE STATISTICAL SERVICESU10CA023318 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI GRAY, ROBERT J · 1985 to 2013
$33.4M
SOUTHWEST ONCOLOGY GROUPU10CA011083 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI FRIEDBERG, JONATHAN W · 1985 to 2013
$5.5M
ONCOLOGYU10CA013650 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI HABERMANN, THOMAS MATTHEW · 1985 to 2013
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA11083NCI NIH HHS CA13650NCI NIH HHS CA23318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a prospective phase III study in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to evaluate whether administration of repeated courses of low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) maintenance therapy after induction of complete remission in advanced AML would improve disease-free and overall survival. Patients with AML in second/later relapse or refractory disease were first treated with a combination of high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine. Those who achieved complete remission were then randomized to observation or to receive LDAC, 10 mg/m2 subcutaneously twice a day x2 21 days every 2 months until relapse occurred. Of 86 patients eligible for randomization, 41 patients were assigned to receive LDAC and 45 patients to observation. The median disease-free survival was 7.4 months for patients assigned to LDAC compared to 3.3 months for patients receiving no additional therapy, P= 0.084. The median survival from randomization was 10.9 months and 7.0 months for patients receiving LDAC maintenance chemotherapy and observation, respectively (P= 0.615). The data from this study suggest that LDAC maintenance therapy given to patients with advanced AML who achieve complete remission can increase disease-free survival compared to observation, but does not improve overall survival. Nevertheless, because of the ineffectiveness and toxicity of intensive post-remission chemotherapy in this circumstance, LDAC maintenance therapy, a tolerable outpatient regimen, offers the potential for improved quality of life.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCytarabineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansLeukemia, MyeloidMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceRemission InductionAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCytarabine

Identifiers

PMID10942228
OpenAlexW2068052500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.