Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10940891›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of immunology2000

Structure-function analysis of a lupus anti-DNA autoantibody: central role of the heavy chain complementarity-determining region 3 Arg in binding of double- and single-stranded DNA.

Z Li, E W Schettino, E A Padlan, H Ikematsu, P Casali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of immunology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Anti-DNA antibodies--quintessential biomarkers of SLE.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2016
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nature and functions of autoantibodies.Nature clinical practice. Rheumatology · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Z LiDepartment of Pathology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.
E W Schettino
E A Padlan
H Ikematsu
P Casali
Cornell University · USHaradoi Hospital · JPNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

SOMATIC HYPERMUTATION IN HUMAN B CELLSR01AR040908 · NIAMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CASALI, PAOLO · 1992 to 2005
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR 40908NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR040908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the contribution of the somatic point mutations and that of the complementarity-determining region (CDR)3 Arg to DNA binding, we engineered the germline V(H) and V(kappa) gene revertant and site-mutagenized the CDR3 Arg residues of the mutated and "antigen-selected" mAb 412.67. This anti-DNA autoantibody was derived from B-1 cells of a lupus patient and bore two H-CDR3 Arg, Arg105 and Arg107, encoded by N segment additions, and one kappa-CDR3 Arg, Arg97, resulting from a point mutation (Kasaian et al. 1994. J. Immunol. 152: 3137-3151; Kasaian et al. 1995. Ann. N.Y Acad. Sci. 764: 410-423). The germ-line revertant bound double-stranded (ds) DNA and single-stranded (ss) DNA as effectively as its wild-type counterpart (relative avidity: 6.4x10(-7) and 9.9x10(-9) vs. 6.7x10(-7) and 9.1 x10(-9) g/microl), raising the possibility that an antigen other than DNA was responsible for the selection of the mAb 412.67 V(H) and V(kappa) point mutations. H-CDR3 Arg105 and Arg107 were both required for dsDNA binding, but either Arg105 or Arg107 was sufficient for ssDNA binding. The central role of Arg105 and Arg107 in DNA binding reflected their solvent-exposed orientation at the apex of the H-CDR3 main loop. Consistent with its inward orientation afar from the antigen-binding surface, the kappa-CDR3 Arg97 played no role in either dsDNA or ssDNA binding.

Indexed as

Complementarity Determining RegionsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, AntinuclearAntibodies, MonoclonalArginineBase SequenceCell LineDNA, Single-StrandedHumansImmunoglobulin FragmentsImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin Joining RegionImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsImmunoglobulin Variable RegionLupus VulgarisAntibodies, AntinuclearAntibodies, MonoclonalArginineComplementarity Determining RegionsDNA, Single-StrandedImmunoglobulin Fragmentsimmunoglobulin FvImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsImmunoglobulin Joining RegionImmunoglobulin kappa-ChainsImmunoglobulin Variable Region

Identifiers

PMID10940891
PMCPMC4623572
OpenAlexW1983263967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.