ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)
Inhibition of passive-avoidance memory formation in the day-old chick by the opioid cytochrophin-4.
Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Central Administration of Opioid Peptides, Vasotocin, Mesotocin, and Corticotrophin-Releasing Factor on Water Intake in Chicks.The journal of poultry science · 2025Article
- Perspectives on Endogenous Opioids in Birds.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytochrophin-4 (cyt-4), a tetrapeptide with opioid-like activity, caused amnesia when injected into chick forebrain 5 hr after passive-avoidance training. Bilateral injections of cyt-4 directly into the lobus parolfactorius (LPO) resulted in the chicks being amnesic for the training task 24 hr later, whereas unilateral injections of cyt-4 were effective only when injected into the right LPO. Cyt-4-induced amnesia was reversed by the general opioid antagonist, naloxone, indicating that cyt-4 was acting via an opioid receptor. The mu- and delta-opioid receptors (but not kappa-opioid or ORL(1)-receptors) have been shown to be involved in memory formation 5 hr after training (). Because an antagonist of the mu-opioid receptor inhibited memory, we attempted to reverse the effect of cyt-4 using mu-opioid receptor agonists. Met[enk] was unable to reverse the inhibition of memory formation by cyt-4 suggesting that the mu-opioid receptor is not involved in this effect. However endomorphin-2 (endo-2) reversed the effect of cyt-4. We further investigated the action of endo-2 using an irreversible antagonist of the mu-receptor, beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FAN), and found that endo-2 reversed beta-FAN-induced amnesia indicating that endo-2 was not acting on the mu-opioid receptor in the chick. Because unilateral injections of beta-FAN were not amnesic (bilateral injections were amnesic) this provided further evidence that the effect of cyt-4 was not mediated via the mu-opioid receptor. Coinjection of the delta-receptor agonist, (D-Pen(2), L-Pen(5))enkephalin (DPLPE), reversed the disruptive effect of cyt-4 on memory. However, memory modulation via the delta-opioid receptor was not lateralized to the right hemisphere suggesting that cyt-4 does not act via this receptor either. It was shown that an antagonist of the epsilon-opioid receptor inhibited memory at the 5 hr time point. We conclude that the epsilon-opioid receptor or an unidentified opioid receptor subtype could be involved in the action of cyt-4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.