SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2000
Revisiting the oral glucose tolerance test criterion for the diagnosis of diabetes.
Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of distinct and similar pathological features between diabetes and Alzheimer's disease.EXCLI journal · 2026Review
- Hypoglycemic mechanisms ofHeliyon · 2023Article
- A Review of Current Trends with Type 2 Diabetes Epidemiology, Aetiology, Pathogenesis, Treatments and Future Perspectives.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2021Review
- Examination of the fasting and 2-h plasma glucose in the light of impairment in beta-cell function: what does the epidemiological data tell us?Endocrine · 2015Article
- Diagnosis and management of diabetes and the relationship of dglucose to kidney function.Current diabetes reviews · 2015Review
- Significance of HbA1c and its measurement in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: US experience.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2014Review
- Diagnosing diabetes with glucose criteria: worshiping a false God.Diabetes care · 2011Article
- An Innovative Mathematical Model: A Key to the Riddle of HbA(1c).International journal of endocrinology · 2010Article
- Elevated HbA1c is an independent predictor of aggressive clinical behavior in patients with colorectal cancer: a case-control study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2008Article
- The association of elevated HbA1c on the behavior of adenomatous polyps in patients with type-II diabetes mellitus.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2008Article
- Hemoglobin A1c concentrations and risk of colorectal cancer in women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2005Article
- Diagnostic criteria for diabetes revisited: making use of combined criteria.BMC endocrine disorders · 2002Article
- Diagnosing diabetes. A practitioner's plea: keep it simple.Journal of general internal medicine · 2000Article
- English language skills and diabetes and hypertension among foreign-born South Asian adults in England.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
- Acculturation and diabetes among Hispanics: evidence from the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes retained the 2-hour glucose concentration on an oral glucose tolerance test of >/=11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) as a criterion to diagnose diabetes. Since glycated hemoglobin levels have emerged as the best measure of long-term glycemia and an important predictor of microvascular and neuropathic complications, we evaluated the distribution of hemoglobin A1C (Hb A1C) levels in individuals who had undergone an oral glucose tolerance test to determine how well 2-hour values could identify those with normal versus increased Hb A1C levels.
designA cross-sectional analysis of 2 large data sets was performed. We cross-tabulated 2-hour glucose concentrations on an oral glucose tolerance test separated into 4 intervals (<7.8 mmol/L [140 mg/dL], 7.8-11.0 mmol/L [140-199 mg/dL], 11.1-13.3 mmol/L [200-239 mg/dL], and >/=13.3 mmol/L [240 mg/dL]) with Hb A1C levels separated into 3 intervals (normal; <1% above the upper limit of normal; and greater than or equal to the upper limit of normal + 1%).
resultsApproximately two thirds of patients in both data sets with 2-hour glucose concentrations of 11.1 to 13.3 mmol/L (200-239 mg/dL) had normal Hb A1C levels. In contrast, 60% to 80% of patients in both data sets with 2-hour glucose concentrations >/=13.3 mmol/L (240 mg/dL) had elevated Hb A1C levels.
conclusionSince Hb A1C levels are the best measures presently available that reflect long-term glycemia, we conclude that the 2-hour glucose concentration criterion on an oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of diabetes should be raised from >/= 11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) to >/= 13.3 mmol/L (240 mg/dL) to remain faithful to the concept that diagnostic concentrations of glucose should predict the subsequent development of specific diabetic complications (e.g., retinopathy).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.