Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10940137›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2000

Will German patients accept their family physician as a gatekeeper?

W Himmel, A Dieterich, M M Kochen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Provision of Health Care by Family Physicians in Taiwan as Illustrated With Population Pyramids.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

W HimmelDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Göttingen, Germany. whimmel@gwdg.de
A Dieterich
M M Kochen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLooking to the experience in the United States with managed care and the possible introduction of gatekeeping in the near future in Germany, we performed a population-based survey to examine preferences for future gatekeeping arrangements.

designCross-sectional telephone survey.

settingFour health districts in Thuringia (formerly East Germany) and Lower Saxony (formerly West Germany).

participantsOut of a random sample of 644 adults in the 4 districts, 415 persons (64.4%) took part in the survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsUsing multiple logistic regression, we analyzed associations between preferences for gatekeeping arrangements and patient satisfaction, insurance status, and sociodemographic characteristics. Seventy-four percent of respondents valued first-contact care, especially older people (odds ratio [OR], 4.3; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.0 to 9.3), people who were very satisfied with the relationship with their family physician (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6 to 4.8) and members of sickness funds in contrast to privately insured persons (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.2). The family physician's influence in coordinating the use of specialist services was appreciated by 86%, more often by members of sickness funds (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 2.4 to 14. 3), people who were very satisfied with their doctor's professional competence (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.3) and older persons (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.7).

conclusionsA vast majority of the German population would accept their family physician as entry point and as coordinator of all other health services. Since patient satisfaction, among other reasons, strongly influenced preferences for gatekeeper arrangements, family physicians themselves may be able to promote primary care health services.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleGatekeepingGermanyHumansInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CarePublic OpinionSurveys and QuestionnairesEmpirical ApproachHealth Care and Public HealthProfessional Patient Relationship

Identifiers

PMID10940137
PMCPMC1495478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.