ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)1999
The "comparative growth assay": examining the interplay of anti-cancer agents with cells carrying single gene alterations.
Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Deficient Mismatch Repair in the Personalized Management of Colorectal Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016Review
- Flow cytometric evaluation of multidrug resistance proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2010Review
- Microsatellite instability due to hMLH1 deficiency is associated with increased cytotoxicity to irinotecan in human colorectal cancer cell lines.British journal of cancer · 2008Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We have developed a "comparative growth assay" that complements current assays of drug effects based on cytotoxicity. A co-culture of two cell lines, one of which is fluorescently labeled, is exposed to a cytotoxic agent and the proportion of fluorescent cells is compared with that of a baseline unexposed co-culture. For demonstration purposes, two HCT116 cell lines (an hMLH1 homozygous and an hMLH1 heterozygous mutant), altered by insertion of vector alone or the same vector carrying an insert for the expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), were exposed to numerous "anti-cancer" agents. The assay was further validated in a system of two cell lines differing only in the expression of the breast cancer resistance protein (BRCP). The assay allowed the estimation of the duration of action of a particular agent. Assessment of the agent's differential activity over a given time in culture could be expressed as a selection rate, which we chose to describe on an "average selection per day" basis. We conclude that this assay: 1) provides insight into the differential dynamic effects of chemotherapeutic agents or radiation; and 2) allows, through the use of matched cell lines, the investigation of critical physiologic features that govern cell sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.