ReviewPaediatric drugs
Recognition, treatment and complications of meningococcal disease.
Review in Paediatric drugs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Serious infections in children: an incidence study in family practice.BMC family practice · 2006Article
- Signs and symptoms in children with a serious infection: a qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningococcal disease remains a major cause of death in young children. A decrease in mortality requires recognition and treatment of the disease at a number of stages in the illness. Life-threatening meningococcal disease usually presents as septicaemia rather than meningitis. The cardinal feature of meningococcal septicaemia is the purpuric rash. Many parents recognise the rash and seek medical advice because of it. When primary care physicians recognise the rash, the administration of parenteral penicillin may decrease mortality. However, antibacterials are not given promptly if there is no rash or if the disease presents in an atypical form. In hospital, antibacterial therapy with a third-generation cephalosporin should be given. Disease severity needs to be assessed by a valid method, such as the Glasgow Meningococcal Septicaemia Prognostic Score (GMSPS). This can identify those patients who need intensive care and/or might benefit from new therapies. The 2 life-threatening complications are septic shock and meningoencephalitis with raised intracranial pressure. Despite numerous case reports of success with potential new treatments, none has been proven safe and/or effective by controlled trials. Although it is tempting to focus on new treatments, the early recognition of severe meningococcal disease by parents, primary care physicians and junior hospital doctors is equally, if not more, important as a potential means of decreasing mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.