Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10934984›Full record

ReviewCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2000

Choosing a first-line drug in the management of elevated blood pressure: what is the evidence? 2: Beta-blockers.

J M Wright

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Beta-blockers for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. The double-edged sword of COX-2 selective NSAIDs.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2002
    Review
  8. Review
  9. The value of industry-sponsored studies of initial antihypertensive therapies.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2001
    Article
  10. Review
  11. First-line drugs for hypertension.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2001
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Choosing a first-line drug in the management of elevated blood pressure: what is the evidence? 3: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2000
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J M WrightDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. jmwright@interchange.ubc.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated blood pressure is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular illness and death. Efforts to reduce that risk have led to recommendations for a wide array of nondrug and drug therapies. Choosing the optimal first-line drug for hypertensive patients should address a hierarchy of treatment goals: decrease in morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension, decrease in blood pressure, good tolerance, dosing convenience and low cost. This article examines the evidence for beta-blockers as a class of first-line antihypertensive drugs in light of these treatment goals. The evidence indicates that beta-blockers are probably not as effective in reducing morbidity and mortality as low-dose thiazide diuretics and that there may be significant differences in effectiveness among various beta-blockers.

Indexed as

BenzothiadiazinesAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsBlood PressureDecision MakingDiureticsHumansHypertensionIncidenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSodium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsBenzothiadiazinesDiureticsSodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID10934984
PMCPMC80212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.