Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10930453›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2000

Analysis of cortical flow models in vivo.

H A Benink, C A Mandato, W M Bement

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Actin Cytoskeletal Dynamics in Single-Cell Wound Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Forward transport of proteins in the plasma membrane of migrating cerebellar granule cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  10. Leading tip drives soma translocation via forward F-actin flow during neuronal migration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  11. Action at a distance during cytokinesis.The Journal of cell biology · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H A BeninkDepartment of Zoology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706, USA.
C A Mandato
W M Bement
Institute of Zoology · KZUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Transient cytoskeletal arraysR01GM052932 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEMENT, WILLIAM · 1997 to 2023
$7.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM52932-01A2NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM052932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical flow, the directed movement of cortical F-actin and cortical organelles, is a basic cellular motility process. Microtubules are thought to somehow direct cortical flow, but whether they do so by stimulating or inhibiting contraction of the cortical actin cytoskeleton is the subject of debate. Treatment of Xenopus oocytes with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) triggers cortical flow toward the animal pole of the oocyte; this flow is suppressed by microtubules. To determine how this suppression occurs and whether it can control the direction of cortical flow, oocytes were subjected to localized manipulation of either the contractile stimulus (PMA) or microtubules. Localized PMA application resulted in redirection of cortical flow toward the site of application, as judged by movement of cortical pigment granules, cortical F-actin, and cortical myosin-2A. Such redirected flow was accelerated by microtubule depolymerization, showing that the suppression of cortical flow by microtubules is independent of the direction of flow. Direct observation of cortical F-actin by time-lapse confocal analysis in combination with photobleaching showed that cortical flow is driven by contraction of the cortical F-actin network and that microtubules suppress this contraction. The oocyte germinal vesicle serves as a microtubule organizing center in Xenopus oocytes; experimental displacement of the germinal vesicle toward the animal pole resulted in localized flow away from the animal pole. The results show that 1) cortical flow is directed toward areas of localized contraction of the cortical F-actin cytoskeleton; 2) microtubules suppress cortical flow by inhibiting contraction of the cortical F-actin cytoskeleton; and 3) localized, microtubule-dependent suppression of actomyosin-based contraction can control the direction of cortical flow. We discuss these findings in light of current models of cortical flow.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsCytoplasmic GranulesMicroscopy, ConfocalMicrotubule-Organizing CenterMicrotubulesModels, BiologicalMovementMyosinsNocodazoleOocytesTetradecanoylphorbol AcetateXenopusActinsMyosinsNocodazoleTetradecanoylphorbol Acetate

Identifiers

PMID10930453
PMCPMC14939
OpenAlexW2111980899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.