ArticleImmunology2000
Evidence for a unique expression of CD4 on murine vaginal CD4+ cells.
Article in Immunology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vaginal T lymphocyte population kinetics during experimental vaginal candidosis: evidence for a possible role of CD8+ T cells in protection against vaginal candidosis.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2003Article
- Chlamydia trachomatis infection does not enhance local cellular immunity against concurrent Candida vaginal infection.Infection and immunity · 2001Article
- Local production of chemokines during experimental vaginal candidiasis.Infection and immunity · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mucosal cell-mediated immunity (CMI) by CD4+ T cells is postulated to be important for host defence against several vaginal pathogens. In addition to the recognized phenotypic distinctions of resident vaginal T lymphocytes, we recently provided evidence by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) that murine vaginal CD4+ T lymphocytes, are differentially recognized by two epitope-distinct anti-CD4 antibodies, suggesting that the CD4 protein on vaginal CD4+ cells is atypically expressed. In the present study, we confirm this by FACS and immunohistochemistry under non-denaturing conditions using two additional anti-CD4 antibodies. However, positive immunohistochemical staining of vaginal CD4+ cells under denaturing conditions revealed that the CD4 epitope in question is indeed present within the CD4 protein. Using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, amplification of CD3, T-cell receptor-beta (TCR-beta), and TCR-delta mRNA from lymph node and vaginal tissue, and CD4 mRNA from lymph node tissue was demonstrable. In contrast, amplification of CD4 mRNA from vaginal tissue, vaginal enriched lymphoid cells, or a purified (FACS-sorted) population of vaginal-specific CD4+ cells using two distinct primer sets was not demonstrable. Altogether, our results provide evidence that the CD4 protein on vaginal CD4+ T cells is conformationally distinct compared with its systemic counterpart, either as a result of a unique CD4 mRNA sequence or from a stable interaction of soluble CD4 with the surface of vaginal T cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.