Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10924144›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2000

Attractant regulation of the aspartate receptor-kinase complex: limited cooperative interactions between receptors and effects of the receptor modification state.

J A Bornhorst, J J Falke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Information processing in bacteria: memory, computation, and statistical physics: a key issues review.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2016
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chemotaxis in Campylobacter jejuni.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Core unit of chemotaxis signaling complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J A BornhorstDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado at Boulder, 80309-0215, USA.
J J Falke

Funding

RECEPTORS &SIGNALING PROTEINS--DYNAMICS &ACTIVATIONR01GM040731 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI FALKE, JOSEPH J · 1988 to 2013
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM R01-40731NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM040731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manner by which the bacterial chemotaxis system responds to a wide range of attractant concentrations remains incompletely understood. In principle, positive cooperativity between chemotaxis receptors could explain the ability of bacteria to respond to extremely low attractant concentrations. By utilizing an in vitro receptor-coupled kinase assay, the attractant-dependent response curve has been measured for the Salmonella typhimurium aspartate chemoreceptor. The attractant chosen, alpha-methyl aspartate, was originally used to quantitate high receptor sensitivity at low attractant concentrations by Segall, Block, and Berg [(1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 8987-8991]. The attractant response curve exhibits limited positive cooperativity, yielding a Hill coefficient of 1.7-2.4, and this Hill coefficient is relatively independent of both the receptor modification state and the mole ratio of CheA to receptor. These results disfavor models in which there are strong cooperative interactions between large numbers of receptor dimers in an extensive receptor array. Instead, the results are consistent with cooperative interactions between a small number of coupled receptor dimers. Because the in vitro receptor-coupled kinase assay utilizes higher than native receptor densities arising from overexpression, the observed positive cooperativity may overestimate that present in native receptor populations. Such positive cooperativity between dimers is fully compatible with the negative cooperativity previously observed between the two symmetric ligand binding sites within a single dimer. The attractant affinity of the aspartate receptor is found to depend on the modification state of its covalent adaptation sites. Increasing the the level of modification decreases the apparent attractant affinity at least 10-fold in the in vitro receptor-coupled kinase assay. This observation helps explain the ability of the chemotaxis pathway to respond to a broad range of attractant concentrations in vivo.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli ProteinsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAspartate KinaseBacterial ProteinsChemotaxisEscherichia coliHistidine KinaseMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsModels, BiologicalModels, ChemicalMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein KinasesReceptors, Amino AcidSalmonella typhimuriumSignal TransductionAspartate Kinaseaspartic acid receptorBacterial ProteinscheA protein, E coliCheW protein, BacteriaCheW protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHistidine KinaseMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsProtein KinasesReceptors, Amino Acid

Identifiers

PMID10924144
PMCPMC2890267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.