Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10922002›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2000

The trapping block of NMDA receptor channels in acutely isolated rat hippocampal neurones.

A I Sobolevsky, M V Yelshansky

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Structural insights into function of ionotropic glutamate receptors.Biochemistry (Moscow) Supplement. Series A, Membrane and cell biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Influences: Russian training.The Journal of general physiology · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Potentiation and Block of ASIC1a by Memantine.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. NMDA Receptors in the Central Nervous System.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  15. Binding of ArgTX-636 in the NMDA receptor ion channel.Journal of molecular biology · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A fast model of voltage-dependent NMDA receptors.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  18. Mechanistic and structural determinants of NMDA receptor voltage-dependent gating and slow Mg2+ unblock.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A I SobolevskyInstitute of General Pathology 1s1sandand1 Pathophysiology, Baltiyskaya 8, 125315 Moscow, Russia. asobolevsky@notes2.cc.sunysb.edu
M V Yelshansky
Research Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor responses were recorded from acutely isolated rat hippocampal neurones using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. A rapid perfusion system was used to study the voltage-dependent block of NMDA channels by Mg2+, amantadine (AM) and N-2-(adamantyl)-hexamethylenimine (A-7). Mg2+, AM and A-7-induced stationary blockade of NMDA channels increased with the blocker concentration but did not depend on the agonist (aspartate; Asp) concentration. Blockade by AM and A-7, but not Mg2+, was weakly use dependent. 'Hooked' tail currents were observed after coapplication of Asp and Mg2+, AM or A-7. The hooked tail current kinetics, amplitude and carried charge indicated that Mg2+, AM and A-7 did not prevent closure and desensitization of NMDA channels nor agonist dissociation. Tail currents following Asp application in the absence and continuous presence of Mg2+, AM or A-7 had similar kinetics. Application of multiple stationary and kinetic criteria to the Mg2+, AM and A-7 blockade led us to conclude that their effects on NMDA channels can be described in terms of a 'trapping' model, which is fully symmetrical with respect to the blocking transition. In general, the apparent blocking/recovery kinetics predicted by the fully symmetrical trapping model differ significantly from the microscopic kinetics and depend on the rate of binding and unbinding of the blocker, the NMDA channel open probability and the rate of solution exchange.

Indexed as

AdamantaneAmantadineAnimalsAntiparkinson AgentsAspartic AcidCell SeparationDopamine AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHippocampusIn Vitro TechniquesIon ChannelsMagnesiumMembrane PotentialsNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPerfusionAdamantaneAmantadineAntiparkinson AgentsAspartic AcidDopamine AgentsIon ChannelsMagnesiumN-(2-adamantyl)hexamethylenimineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID10922002
PMCPMC2270033
OpenAlexW2146019228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.