Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10920042›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2000

Sensitivity enhancement in fluorescence correlation spectroscopy of multiple species using time-gated detection.

D C Lamb, A Schenk, C Röcker, C Scalfi-Happ, G U Nienhaus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Filtered FCS: species auto- and cross-correlation functions highlight binding and dynamics in biomolecules.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pulsed interleaved excitation.Biophysical journal · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D C LambDepartment of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801-3080 USA.
A Schenk
C Röcker
C Scalfi-Happ
G U Nienhaus

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) is a powerful technique to measure chemical reaction rates and diffusion coefficients of molecules in thermal equilibrium. The capabilities of FCS can be enhanced by measuring the energy, polarization, or delay time between absorption and emission of the collected fluorescence photons in addition to their arrival times. This information can be used to change the relative intensities of multiple fluorescent species in FCS measurements and, thus, the amplitude of the intensity autocorrelation function. Here we demonstrate this strategy using lifetime gating in FCS experiments. Using pulsed laser excitation and laser-synchronized gating in the detection channel, we suppress photons emitted within a certain time interval after excitation. Three applications of the gating technique are presented: suppression of background fluorescence, simplification of FCS reaction studies, and investigation of lifetime heterogeneity of fluorescently labeled biomolecules. The usefulness of this technique for measuring forward and backward rates of protein fluctuations in equilibrium and for distinguishing between static and dynamic heterogeneity makes it a promising tool in the investigation of chemical reactions and conformational fluctuations in biomolecules.

Indexed as

Fluorescent DyesDiffusionKineticsSensitivity and SpecificitySpectrometry, FluorescenceThermodynamicsFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID10920042
PMCPMC1301008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.