ArticleBiophysical journal2000
Magnetic phagosome motion in J774A.1 macrophages: influence of cytoskeletal drugs.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on Kupffer cell phagosomal motility, bacterial clearance, and liver function.International journal of nanomedicine · 2015Article
- Scavenger receptor mediated endocytosis of silver nanoparticles into J774A.1 macrophages is heterogeneous.ACS nano · 2012Article
- A method for spatially resolved local intracellular mechanochemical sensing and organelle manipulation.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
- Mast cell TLR2 signaling is crucial for effective killing of Francisella tularensis.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2012Article
- Diminished organelle motion in murine Kupffer cells during the erythrocytic stage of malaria.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2011Article
- Article
- The role of F-actin and myosin in epithelial cell rheology.Biophysical journal · 2006Article
- Motion and twisting of magnetic particles ingested by alveolar macrophages in the human lung: effect of smoking and disease.Biomagnetic research and technology · 2006Article
- Differential requirements for actin polymerization, calmodulin, and Ca2+ define distinct stages of lysosome/phagosome targeting.Molecular biology of the cell · 2006Article
- Ultrafine particles cause cytoskeletal dysfunctions in macrophages: role of intracellular calcium.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2005Article
- Acto-myosin cytoskeleton dependent viscosity and shear-thinning behavior of the amoeba cytoplasm.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2005Article
- Phagosome maturation: aging gracefully.The Biochemical journal · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of the different cytoskeletal structures like microfilaments (MF), microtubuli (MT), and intermediate filaments (IF) in phagosome motion is unclear. These cytoskeletal units play an important role in macrophage function (migration, phagocytosis, phagosome transport). We investigated ferromagnetic phagosome motions by cell magnetometry. J774A.1 macrophages were incubated with 1.3-microm spherical magnetite particles for 24 h, after which more than 90% of the particles had been phagocytized. Phagosome motions can be caused either by the cell itself (relaxation) or by applying magnetic twisting forces, yielding cell stiffness and viscoelastic properties of the cytoskeleton. Apparent viscosity of the cytoplasm was non-Newtonian and showed a shear-rate-dependent power law behavior. Elastically stored energy does not force the magnetic phagosomes back to their initial orientation: 57% of the twisting shear was not recoverable. Cytoskeletal drugs, like Cytochalasin D (CyD, 2 - 4 microM), Colchicine (CoL, 10 microM), or Acrylamide (AcL, 40 mM) were added in order to disturb the different cytoskeletal structures. AcL disintegrates IF, but affected neither stochastic (relaxation) nor directed phagosome motions. CyD disrupts MF, resulting in a retarded stochastic phagosome motion (relative decay 0.53 +/- 0.01 after 5 min versus 0.34 +/- 0.01 in control), whereas phagosome twisting shows only a small response with a 9% increase of stiffness and a small reduction of recoverable strain. CoL depolymerizes the MT, inducing a moderately accelerated relaxation (relative decay 0.28 +/- 0.01 after 5 min) and a 10% increase of cell stiffness, where the pure viscous shear is increased and the viscoelastic recoil is inhibited by 40%. Combining the two drugs conserves both effects. After disintegrating either MF or MT, phagosome motion and cytoskeletal stiffness reflect the behavior of either MT or MF, respectively. The results verify that the dominant phagosome transport mechanism is MF-associated. MT depolymerization by CoL induces an activation of the F-actin synthesis, which may induce an accelerated relaxation and an increase of stiffness. Cell mechanical properties are not modulated by MF depolymerization, whereas MT depolymerization causes a loss of viscous resistance and a loss of cell elasticity. The mean energy for stochastic phagosome transport is 5*10(-18) Joules and corresponds to a force of 7 pN on a single 1.3-microm phagosome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.