ArticleBiophysical journal2000
Bending and adaptability to proteins of the cAMP DNA-responsive element: molecular dynamics contrasted with NMR.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Allosteric communication between DNA-binding and light-responsive domains of diatom class I aureochromes.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Pre-organized structure of viral DNA at the binding-processing site of HIV-1 integrase.Nucleic acids research · 2005Article
- Altered structural fluctuations in duplex RNA versus DNA: a conformational switch involving base pair opening.Nucleic acids research · 2003Article
- Evolutionary conservation and functional synergism of curved DNA at the mouse epsilon- and other globin-gene promoters.Journal of molecular evolution · 2003Article
- Impact of CpG methylation on structure, dynamics and solvation of cAMP DNA responsive element.Nucleic acids research · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA bending is assumed to play a crucial role during recognition of the cAMP-responsive element (CRE) by transcription factors. However, diverging results have been obtained for the bending direction of the unbound double helix. The refined NMR structures present a bend directed toward the minor groove, while biochemical methods conclude that there is a bend toward the major groove. The present 10-ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of d(GAGATGACGTCATCTC)(2), which contains the octamer CRE in its center, was carried out with AMBER in explicit water and counterions. It shows that CRE is a flexible segment, although it is bent slightly toward the major groove (7 degrees -8 degrees ) on the average. The MD structure agrees with both the biochemical results and unrefined NMR data. The divergence with the NMR refined structures suggests an improper electrostatic parameterization in the refinement software. The malleability of the central CpG is certainly the major contribution to the curving of the whole CRE segment in both the unbound and bound states. Comparison with the crystal structure of CRE bound to GCN4 shows that the deformation induced by the protein is concentrated mainly on the CpG step, rendering the bound structure of CRE closer to the structure of the 12-0 tetradecanoylphorbol-beta-acetate-responsive element.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.