Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10918406›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2000

High-dose melphalan-based chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation after second look laparotomy in patients with chemosensitive advanced ovarian carcinoma: long-term results.

F Bertucci, P Viens, J R Delpero, V J Bardou, C Faucher, G Houvenaeghel, D Maraninchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Are there candidates for high-dose chemotherapy in ovarian carcinoma?Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2012
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Evidence for a graft-versus-tumor effect in refractory ovarian cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2003
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F BertucciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
P Viens
J R Delpero
V J Bardou
C Faucher
G Houvenaeghel
D Maraninchi
Institut Paoli-Calmettes · FRAix-Marseille Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of dose intensity has been suggested in ovarian carcinoma. We retrospectively evaluated the long-term results of melphalan-based high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with hematopoietic rescue in a unicentric series of 33 patients with advanced ovarian cancer sensitive to first-line chemotherapy. Before HDC, treatment with debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy was followed by second-look operation (SLO). HDC consisted of melphalan (n = 8), melphalan and cyclophosphamide (n = 9), or melphalan, etoposide and carboplatinum (n = 16). Toxicity was mainly hematological. One death occurred from infection during aplasia. With a median follow-up of 60 months after intensification, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 29% and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 45%. Survival differed significantly according to tumor status at SLO. Women with microscopic or macroscopic disease at SLO, ie with a pathological partial response to first-line therapy (PPR), had survivals of 7% at 5 years, similar to other salvage therapies. Better results were obtained in the 20 women with a complete pathological response (PCR) at SLO with 43% 5-year PFS (median, 51 months) and 75% 5-year OS (median not reached). In conclusion, melphalan-based HDC with hematopoietic rescue had an acceptable toxicity in patients with chemosensitive advanced ovarian cancer. In situations of salvage therapy for patients in PPR, this treatment was not effective in long-term analysis. On the contrary, long-term results were favorable in patients with PCR, suggesting further prospective randomized studies comparing HDC and other consolidation treatments should be undertaken in this particular situation.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCyclophosphamideCystadenocarcinomaDisease-Free SurvivalEtoposideFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparotomyMelphalanMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsCarboplatinCyclophosphamideEtoposideMelphalan

Identifiers

PMID10918406
OpenAlexW2087882824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.