Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10916580›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science1998

Physician benchmarking: measuring variation in practice behavior in treatment of otitis media.

Y A Ozcan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Efficiency of physician specialist groups.Health care management science · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The effect of quality and socio-demographic variables on efficiency measures in primary health care.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Evaluating emergency physicians: data envelopment analysis approach.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Technical efficiency in primary health care: does quality matter?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2011
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Y A OzcanDepartment of Health Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298-0203, USA. ozcan@hsc.vcu.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study uses Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to analyze physician practice behavior and develops measures of physician practice efficiency as a basis for improving productivity and reducing costs in otitis media treatment. Other objectives include determining geographic variations in practice patterns for otitis media, and the impact of inefficient practice patterns on the cost of treatment of otitis media. Only 46 (28.8%) of the 160 physicians were classified as efficient. Average total cost of an episode by efficient providers was $357.03 and $492.06 for inefficient providers. By restricting particular inputs and outputs, and directing all physicians to treat otitis media through a balanced primary care model, physicians would be able to provide the same quality care at an average savings of 23.7% per efficient and 4.4% per inefficient provider.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingCost SavingsEpisode of CareHealth Care CostsHumansOtitis MediaPractice Patterns, Physicians'Virginia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.