Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10915134›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Recent advances. Medical ethics.

P A Singer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Getting fairer over time? Assessing changes in health technology funding processes using the accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Successful priority setting in low and middle income countries: a framework for evaluation.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2010
    Article
  9. Ethics in medical curriculum; Ethics by the teachers for students and society.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A strategy to improve priority setting in developing countries.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2007
    Article
  13. Should research be part of advance care planning?Critical care (London, England) · 2005
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Ethics in exercise science research.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2002
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical ethics revisited.BMC medical ethics · 2001
    Article
  19. A new look at international research ethics.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P A SingerUniversity of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, 88 College Street, Toronto ON, Canada M5G-1L4.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Bioethical IssuesEthics, MedicalBiotechnologyEducation, MedicalGlobal HealthHealth PrioritiesHumansInformation ServicesMedical ErrorsPalliative CareBioethics and Professional Ethics

Identifiers

PMID10915134
PMCPMC1118276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.