Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10908552›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Early use of inhaled corticosteroids in the emergency department treatment of acute asthma.

M L Edmonds, C A Camargo, C V Pollack, B H Rowe

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Corticosteroids for hospitalised children with acute asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. 6. Asthma.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2003
    Review
  4. Management of acute pediatric asthma.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2002
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M L EdmondsDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, 1G1 Walter Mackenzie Centre, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7.
C A Camargo
C V Pollack
B H Rowe
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystemic corticosteroids therapy is central to the management of acute asthma The use of inhaled steroids may also be beneficial in this setting.

objectivesTo determine the benefit of ICS for the treatment of patients with acute asthma managed in the emergency department (ED). SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Airways Review Group register. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews, and texts also were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only RCTs or quasi-randomised trials were eligible for inclusion. Studies were included if patients presented with acute asthma to the ED or its equivalent, and were treated with ICS or placebo, in addition to standard therapy. Two reviewers independently selected potentially relevant articles, and then independently selected articles for inclusion. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers if the authors were unable to verify the validity of extracted information. Missing data were obtained from the authors or calculated from other data presented in the paper. MAIN

resultsSeven trials were selected for inclusion, but data were not available for one of them. In the six usable rials, (4 adult, 2 paediatric), a total of 352 patients were studied (179 ICS, 173 non-ICS treated). Patients treated with ICS were less likely to be admitted to hospital (OR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.57). This benefit was confined to patients not receiving concomitant systemic steroids. Such patients showed the same, but non-significant, trend towards reduced admissions compared to placebo treatment (OR 0.46; 95% CI: 0. 19, 1.11). In children, ICS appeared to be at least as effective as systemic steroids (OR 0.5; 95% CI: 0.24, 1.06). Patients receiving ICS demonstrated small, significant improvements in peak expiratory flows (PEFR WMD: 7%; 95% CI: 3, 13) and forced expiratory volumes (FEV-FEV1 WMD: 5.0%; 95% CI: 0.4, 9.7). The treatment was well tolerated, with few reported adverse side effects. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsInhaled steroids reduced admission rates in patients with acute asthma who were not receiving concomitant systemic steroids. In children, inhaled steroids appear to be at least as effective as systemic steroids. Further research is needed to clarify the effect of ICS when used in addition to systemic corticosteroids, and to determine the optimal dose, agent, and frequency of ICS administration.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaChildEmergenciesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID10908552
OpenAlexW4241933401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.