Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10908530›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Macrolide antibiotics for cystic fibrosis.

K W Southern, P M Barker, A Solis

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Role of macrolide therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2008
    Review
  2. New insights into pulmonary inflammation in cystic fibrosis.Archives of disease in childhood · 2006
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

K W SouthernChild Health, University of Liverpool, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK, L12 2AP. kwsouth@liv.ac.uk
P M Barker
A Solis
Alder Hey Children's Hospital · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCystic Fibrosis is characterised by chest infection, the antibiotic treatment of which has significantly improved the outlook for people with this condition. The unusual nature of organisms that infect the chest of individuals with cystic fibrosis has restricted antibiotic choice. In particular the bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, is resistant to nearly all antibiotics that can be taken by mouth. There is laboratory evidence and evidence from other disease processes that macrolide antibiotics, whilst not directly active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, may have indirect actions against this bacteria.

objectivesThis review aimed to test the hypotheses that macrolide antibiotics; 1) Improve clinical status compared to placebo or another antibiotic 2) do not have unacceptable adverse effects If benefit was demonstrated, we aimed to assess the optimal type, dose and duration of macrolide therapy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group specialist trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. In addition, Principal Investigators, known to work in the field and previous authors were contacted for unpublished or follow up data. Pharmaceutical companies, that manufacture macrolide antibiotics, were approached. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, published or unpublished, of macrolide compared to placebo, another class of antibiotic or another macrolide. Studies which compare regimes of the same macrolide at different doses will also be included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No completed randomised controlled trials were identified. MAIN

resultsThree open studies excluded. Four ongoing randomised controlled trials were identified. No completed randomised controlled trials were identified. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsAt present, there are no randomised controlled trials to evaluate the use of macrolide antibiotics for the treatment of chest infection in people with cystic fibrosis. Such trials, with clear outcome measures, are needed to properly evaluate this potentially useful treatment for cystic fibrosis.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsClinical Trials as TopicCystic FibrosisHumansMacrolidesOutcome Assessment, Health CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolides

Identifiers

PMID10908530
OpenAlexW4246124084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.