SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Short-acting beta 2 agonists for stable COPD.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Should we avoid beta-agonists for moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? NO.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterised by progressive airflow limitation that is at best partially reversible. Despite the lack of reversibility patients with stable often report symptomatic improvement with short-acting beta-2 bronchodilator medication.
objectivesTo determine the clinical effectiveness and assess the adverse effects of regular treatment with short-acting beta-2 agonists bronchodilators in patients with stable COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: A search was carried out using the Cochrane Airways Group database. In addition, reference lists of review articles and retrieved studies were searched for other potentially relevant citations. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of at least one week in duration that compared treatment with inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonists delivered by metered dose inhaler or nebuliser with placebo in patients with stable COPD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data extraction and study quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Where further or missing data was required, authors of studies were contacted. The data were analysed using the Cochrane Review Manager 4.0.4. MAIN
resultsThirteen studies were included. All used a cross-over design and were of high quality. Post-bronchilator spirometry performed at the end of the study period showed a significant increase in FEV1 compared to placebo; weighted mean difference (WMD) =0.14 L; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.25. This effect was only seen in studies in which the drug was delivered by metered dose inhaler. Post-bronchodilator morning and evening PEFR were significantly better during active treatment than during placebo; WMD=29.2 L/min; 95%CI 0.3 to 58.1 & WMD = 36.8 L/min; 95%CI: 2.6 to 70.9 respectively. A significant improvement in daily breathlessness score was observed during treatment with beta-2 agonist when compared to placebo; standardised mean difference (SMD) =1.33; 95%CI: 1.0 to 1.65. There was no improvement in exercise performance. The risk of dropping out of the study (ie treatment failure) when on treatment with placebo was almost twice that of patients on treatment with beta-2 agonists; Relative Risk =0.49; 95%CI 0.33-0.73). Patients preferred beta-2 agonist therapy more frequently than placebo; Odds Ratio = 9.04; 95%CI 4.6 to 17.61). No studies reported serious side effects during treatment with inhaled beta-agonists, but none were of sufficient size or length to allow any meaningful information on long-term occurrence of side effects. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsShort-acting beta-2 agonists delivered by metered dose inhaler on a regular basis improve lung function. Breathlessness but not exercise performance are also improved. There are insufficient data to provide reliable information on long-term adverse effects. Use of these drugs as first line agents for symptomatic treatment of COPD is supported by this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10908502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.