Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10908458›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Cephalic version by postural management for breech presentation.

G J Hofmeyr, R Kulier

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00465712 (Effect of Amnioinfusion on External Cephalic Version After Initial Failure a Prospective Multicentric Randomized Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00465712 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2006, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Amnioinfusion on External Cephalic Version After Initial Failure a Prospective Multicentric Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, ToursRan2006 to 2011Enrolled119ConditionsBreech PresentationArmstransabdominal amnioinfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G J HofmeyrEffective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Frere/Cecilia Makiwane Hospitals, Private Bag 9047, East London 5200, Eastern Cape, South Africa. gjh@global.co.za.
R Kulier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is possible that maternal posture may influence fetal position. Many postural techniques have been used to promote cephalic version.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of postural management of breech presentation on measures of pregnancy outcome. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth trials register and Controlled Trials Register were searched. Date of last search: March 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing postural management with pelvic elevation for breech presentation, with a control group. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility and trial quality were assessed by one or both reviewers. MAIN

resultsFive studies involving a total of 392 women were included. No effect of postural management on the rate non-cephalic births was detected, either for the subgroup in which no external cephalic version was attempted, or for the group overall (relative risk 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.11). No differences were detected for caesarean sections or Apgar scores below seven at one minute. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is no evidence to support the use of postural management for breech presentation. The numbers of women studied to date remain relatively small.

Indexed as

Breech PresentationDelivery, ObstetricPostureCesarean SectionConfidence IntervalsFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.