Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10903973›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2000

Cytoplasmic binding and disposition kinetics of diclofenac in the isolated perfused rat liver.

M Weiss, O Kuhlmann, D Y Hung, M S Roberts

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of dose, flow rate, and bile acid on diclofenac disposition in the perfused rat liver.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2016
    Article
  2. Fractal structure of the liver: effect on drug elimination.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M WeissSection of Pharmacokinetics, Department of Pharmacology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany. michael.weiss@medizin.unihalle.de
O Kuhlmann
D Y Hung
M S Roberts
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The binding kinetics of diclofenac to hepatocellular structures were evaluated in the perfused rat liver using the multiple indicator dilution technique and a stochastic model of organ transit time density. 2. The single-pass, in situ rat liver preparation was perfused with buffer solution (containing 2% albumin) at 30 ml min(-1). Diclofenac and [(14)C]-sucrose (extracellular reference) were injected simultaneously as a bolus dose into the portal vein (six experiments in three rats). An analogous series of experiments was performed with [(14)C]-diclofenac and [(3)H]-sucrose. 3. The diclofenac outflow data were analysed using three models of intracellular distribution kinetics, assuming (1) instantaneous distribution and binding (well-mixed model), (2) 'slow' binding at specific intracellular sites after instantaneous distribution throughout the cytosol (slow binding model), and (3) 'slowing' of cytoplasmic diffusion due to instantaneous binding (slow diffusion model). 4. The slow binding model provided the best description of the data. The rate constants for cellular influx and sequestration were 0.126+/-0. 026 and 0.013+/-0.009 s(-1), respectively. The estimated ratio of cellular initial distribution volume to extracellular volume of 2.82 indicates an almost instantaneous distribution in the cellular water space, while the corresponding ratio of 5.54 estimated for the apparent tissue distribution volume suggests a relatively high hepatocellular binding. The non-instantaneous intracellular equilibration process was characterized by time constants of the binding and unbinding process of 53.8 and 49.5 s, respectively. The single-pass availability of diclofenac was 86%. The results obtained with [(14)C]-diclofenac and [(3)H]-sucrose were not statistically different.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding, CompetitiveCytoplasmDiclofenacKineticsLiverModels, BiologicalPerfusionRatsRats, WistarSucroseTime FactorsDiclofenacSucrose

Identifiers

PMID10903973
PMCPMC1572206
OpenAlexW2048046096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.