ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology2000
The use of competitive PCR mimic to evaluate a Limulus lambda phage genomic DNA library.
Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Identification and characterization of syntaxin 1 antisense variants in Limulus polyphemus.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
1. A lambda phage genomic DNA library for Limulus (L.) polyphemus brain was constructed using the AGEM-12 vector and the host strain KW251. 2. The primary library contained approximately 1.275 x 10(6) independent clones, increasing upon amplfication to 6.66 x 10(9) pfu/ml in a total volume of 58 ml. 3. A total of 28 clones was randomly chosen for a determination of the average size of inserts in the library. All clones contained inserts and the average size was 14.9 kb, ranging from 11.7 to 28.0 kb. The library provides a 10-fold equivalent of the L. polyphemus genome. 4. A new approach for evaluating a genomic DNA library was developed, in which competitive PCR MIMIC was employed to determine the target gene copy number in both constructed library and brain genomic DNA. The putative protein kinase C epsilon (PKCepsilon) was selected as the target gene because its partial sequence of cDNA was recently cloned from L. polyphemus brain in our laboratory (Cao et al., 1998). A 419-bp fragment of nonhomologous sequence derived from putative PKCepsilon and a 306-bp fragment from plasmid pUC 18 were generated for use as target and competitor in PCR MIMIC, respectively. 5. Within the genomic library DNA, a 0.8 value was obtained for the copy number of the putative PKCepsilon gene that was detected in 0.1 amol of one equivalent L. polyphemus genome in terms of the average recombinant molecular weight. In the genomic DNA, a single copy of putative PKCepsilon was found in 0.1 amol of one coverage for the L. polyphemus genome. Thus, it was implied that nearly 80% genetic resource was incorporated into the library. This percentage was termed the incorporation rate. 6. Based on these findings, we suggest that the incorporation rate is an essential factor for evaluating genomic libraries, particularly, when using partial digestion with restriction enzymes for library construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.