Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10900461›Full record

ArticleYeast (Chichester, England)2000

Current awareness.

R Drysdale, L Bayraktaroglu

Abstract readBibliography
In one paragraph

Article in Yeast (Chichester, England), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R DrysdaleFlyBase-Cambridge, Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, UK.
L Bayraktaroglu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to keep subscribers up-to-date with the latest developments in their field, this current awareness service is provided by John Wiley & Sons and contains newly-published material on comparative and functional genomics. Each bibliography is divided into 16 sections. 1 Reviews & symposia; 2 General; 3 Large-scale sequencing and mapping; 4 Genome evolution; 5 Comparative genomics; 6 Gene families and regulons; 7 Pharmacogenomics; 8 Large-scale mutagenesis programmes; 9 Functional complementation; 10 Transcriptomics; 11 Proteomics; 12 Protein structural genomics; 13 Metabolomics; 14 Genomic approaches to development; 15 Technological advances; 16 Bioinformatics. Within each section, articles are listed in alphabetical order with respect to author. If, in the preceding period, no publications are located relevant to any one of these headings, that section will be omitted

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID10900461
PMCPMC2448328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.