Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10899976›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2000

Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome.

G Blanc, A Barakat, R Guyot, R Cooke, M Delseny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 225 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
225citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

225 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Comprehensive identification ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The ATXN2 OrthologsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

165 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G BlancLaboratoire Génome et Développement des Plantes, Unité Mixte de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Perpignan, France.
A Barakat
R Guyot
R Cooke
M Delseny

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic analysis of the Arabidopsis genome provides a basis for detailed studies of genome structure and evolution. Members of multigene families were mapped, and random sequence alignment was used to identify regions of extended similarity in the Arabidopsis genome. Detailed analysis showed that the number, order, and orientation of genes were conserved over large regions of the genome, revealing extensive duplication covering the majority of the known genomic sequence. Fine mapping analysis showed much rearrangement, resulting in a patchwork of duplicated regions that indicated deletion, insertion, tandem duplication, inversion, and reciprocal translocation. The implications of these observations for evolution of the Arabidopsis genome as well as their usefulness for analysis and annotation of the genomic sequence and in comparative genomics are discussed.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenome, PlantArabidopsisChromosomes, BacterialMolecular Sequence Data

Identifiers

PMID10899976
PMCPMC149051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.