Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10899145›Full record

ArticleGenome research2000

Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction validation of 25 "orphan" genes from Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655.

J P Alimi, O Poirot, F Lopez, J M Claverie

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Folding Optimization In Vivo Uncovers New Chaperones.Journal of molecular biology · 2015
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase multienzyme complex of Haloferax volcanii.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2008
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Unravelling the ORFan Puzzle.Comparative and functional genomics · 2003
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J P AlimiStructural and Genetic Information Laboratory, Marseille, France.
O Poirot
F Lopez
J M Claverie
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDélégation Provence et Corse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the accumulation of sequence information sampling from a broad spectrum of phyla, newly sequenced genomes continue to reveal a high proportion (50%-30%) of "uncharacterized" genes, including a significant number of strictly "orphan" genes, i.e., putative open reading frames (ORFs) without any resemblance to previously determined protein-coding sequences. Most genes found in databases have only been predicted by computer methods and have never been experimentally validated. Although theoretical evolutionary arguments support the reality of genes when homologs are found in a variety of distant species, this is not the case for orphan genes. Here, we report the direct reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay of 25 strictly orphan ORFs of Escherichia coli. Two growth conditions, exponential and stationary phases, were tested. Transcripts were identified for a total of 19 orphan genes, with 2 genes found to be expressed in only one of the two growth conditions. Our results suggest that a vast majority of E. coli ORFs presently annotated as "hypothetical" correspond to bona fide genes. By extension, this implies that randomly occurring "junk" ORFs have been actively counter selected during the evolution of the dense E. coli genome.

Indexed as

Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionEscherichia coliGenes, BacterialOpen Reading FramesPromoter Regions, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID10899145
PMCPMC310931
OpenAlexW2124037112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.