Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10898689›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2000

Pharmacokinetics of single-dose oral stavudine in subjects with renal impairment and in subjects requiring hemodialysis.

D M Grasela, R R Stoltz, M Barry, M Bone, B Mangold, P O'Grady, R Raymond, S J Haworth

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Recent developments of nanotherapeutics for targeted and long-acting, combination HIV chemotherapy.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2019
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

D M GraselaBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA. dennis.grasela@bms.com
R R Stoltz
M Barry
M Bone
B Mangold
P O'Grady
R Raymond
S J Haworth
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Sweden) · SEBristol-Myers Squibb (Belgium) · BERoyal Liverpool University Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two open-label studies assessed the pharmacokinetics of single orally administered doses of 40 mg of stavudine in subjects with renal impairment. In one study (study I), 15 subjects with selected degrees of renal impairment, but not requiring hemodialysis, were stratified into three groups of five subjects each according to creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) normalized by body surface area (ml/min/1.73 m(2)): mild (CL(CR), 60 to 80), moderate (30 to 50), and severe (</=20) renal impairment. Five healthy subjects (CL(CR) >/= 90) were also enrolled. The stavudine area under the curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) increased nonlinearly with declining renal function: 1,864, 2,215, 3,609, and 5,928 ng. h/ml for normal renal function and for mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively (P = 0.0001 between renal impairment groups). The following stavudine dosage recommendations for renal impairment were proposed for subjects weighing >/=60 kg: CL(CR) of >50 ml/min/1.73 m(2), 40 mg every 12 h; CL(CR) of 21 to 50 ml/min/1. 73 m(2), 20 mg every 12 h; and CL(CR) of 10 to 20 ml/min/1.73 m(2), 20 mg every 24 h. For subjects weighing <60 kg, the proposed doses were 30, 15, and 15 mg, respectively, with the same dosing intervals specified above. In a second study (study II), 12 subjects with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis three times a week were enrolled in a randomized, open-label crossover study (dialysis 2 h after dosing and lasting 4 h or dosing without dialysis). There were no statistically significant differences for AUC(0-infinity), AUC(2-6), time to maximum concentration of drug in serum, half-life, or apparent oral clearance when the two treatment dosage regimens were compared. As a result of study II, the recommended dosing rate for subjects requiring hemodialysis was the same as that proposed for those with severe renal impairment not requiring hemodialysis; however, dosing was recommended to follow hemodialysis and to occur at the same time each day.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRenal InsufficiencyStavudineAnti-HIV AgentsStavudine

Identifiers

PMID10898689
PMCPMC90027
OpenAlexW2101627988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.