Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10898675›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2000

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic modeling of abacavir (1592U89) from a dose-ranging, double-blind, randomized monotherapy trial with human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects.

S Weller, K M Radomski, Y Lou, D S Stein

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Abacavir and metabolite pharmacokinetics in HIV-1-infected children and adolescents.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2009
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Population pharmacokinetics of abacavir in pregnant women.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs in older persons.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S WellerWorldwide Clinical Pharmacology, Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA. sw46385@glaxowellcome.com
K M Radomski
Y Lou
D S Stein
Research Triangle Park Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abacavir (formerly 1592U89) is a carbocyclic nucleoside analog with potent anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) activity when administered alone or in combination with other antiretroviral agents. The population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of abacavir were investigated in 41 HIV type 1 (HIV-1)-infected, antiretroviral naive adults with baseline CD4(+) cell counts of >/=100/mm(3) and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of >30,000 copies/ml. Data for analysis were obtained from patients who received randomized, blinded monotherapy with abacavir at 100, 300, or 600 mg twice-daily (BID) for up to 12 weeks. Plasma abacavir concentrations from sparse sampling were analyzed by standard population pharmacokinetic methods, and the effects of dose, combination therapy, gender, weight, and age on parameter estimates were investigated. Bayesian pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were calculated to determine the peak concentration of abacavir in plasma (C(max)) and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) for individual subjects. The pharmacokinetics of abacavir were dose proportional over the 100- to 600-mg dose range and were unaffected by any covariates. No significant correlations were observed between the incidence of the five most common adverse events (headache, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and malaise or fatigue) and AUC(0-infinity). A significant correlation was observed between C(max) and nausea by categorical analysis (P = 0.019), but this was of borderline significance by logistic regression (odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 2.32). The log(10) time-averaged AUC(0-infinity) minus baseline (AAUCMB) values for HIV-1 RNA and CD4(+) cell count correlated significantly with C(max) and AUC(0-infinity), but with better model fits for AUC(0-infinity). The increase in AAUCMB values for CD4(+) cell count plateaued early for drug exposures that were associated with little change in AAUCMB values for plasma HIV-1 RNA. There was less than a 0.4 log(10) difference over 12 weeks in the HIV-1 RNA levels with the doubling of the abacavir AUC(0-infinity) from 300 to 600 mg BID dosing. In conclusion, pharmacodynamic modeling supports the selection of abacavir 300 mg twice-daily dosing.

Indexed as

AbacavirAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsDideoxynucleosidesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleRNA, ViralAbacavirAnti-HIV AgentsDideoxynucleosidesRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID10898675
PMCPMC90013
OpenAlexW2116046162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.