Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10898674›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2000

A population pharmacokinetic analysis of the penetration of the prostate by levofloxacin.

G L Drusano, S L Preston, M Van Guilder, D North, M Gombert, M Oefelein, L Boccumini, B Weisinger, M Corrado, J Kahn

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Comparison of levofloxacin-based prophylaxis regimens for transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized single-center study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

G L DrusanoDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York 12208, USA. GLDRUSANO@AOL.COM
S L Preston
M Van Guilder
D North
M Gombert
M Oefelein
L Boccumini
B Weisinger
M Corrado
J Kahn
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USBiolog (United States) · USOrtho Clinical Diagnostics (United States) · USDenver VA Medical Center · USLong Beach Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · USWright-Patterson Air Force Base · US

Funding

POPULATION PHARMACOKINETICS MODELING ON A SUPERCOMPUTERR01RR011526 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JELLIFFE, ROGER W. · 1996 to 2001
$608k
NCRR NIH HHS R01-RR11526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostatitis has remained a pathological entity that is difficult to treat. Part of the difficulty revolves about the putative offending pathogens. For acute prostatitis, members of the Enterobacteriaceae, particularly Escherichia coli, play a central role, while intracellular pathogens such as Chlamydia are more frequently seen in chronic prostatitis. Consequently, a drug needs to be able to penetrate to this specialized site in both the acute and chronic infection forms of the disease and also have potent activity against the most common causative pathogens, both intracellular and extracellular. Levofloxacin has such an activity profile. We wished to document its ability to penetrate to the site of infection. Patients undergoing prostatectomies were administered 500 mg of levofloxacin orally every 24 h for 2 days prior to surgery, and then on the day of surgery, 500 mg was administered as an hour-long, constant-rate intravenous (i.v.) infusion. A set of blood samples was obtained as guided by stochastic optimal design theory. Prostate biopsy times were determined by randomizing subjects into one of four groups, based on the interval after the i.v. dose. All plasma and prostate drug concentrations were comodeled by a population modeling program, BigNPEM, implemented on the Cray T3E Supercomputer housed at the Supercomputer Center at the University of California at San Diego. Penetration was determined as the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of levofloxacin in the prostate to the plasma levofloxacin AUC. When calculated from the mean population parameters, this penetration ratio was 2.96. We also performed a 1,000-subject Monte Carlo simulation from the mean parameter vector and covariance matrix. The mean penetration ratio here was 4.14 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.20 to 19.6. Over 70% of the population had a penetration ratio in excess of 1.0. Levofloxacin adequately penetrates a noninflamed prostate and should be evaluated for the therapy of prostatitis.

Indexed as

LevofloxacinAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Infective AgentsDemographyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodOfloxacinProstateProstatitisAnti-Infective AgentsLevofloxacinOfloxacin

Identifiers

PMID10898674
PMCPMC90012
OpenAlexW2136725579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.