ReviewOccupational and environmental medicine2000
Modern approaches to blood pressure measurement.
Review in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An epidemiological re-appraisal of the association between blood pressure and blood lead: a meta-analysis.Journal of human hypertension · 2002Pooled it
- Trial
- Reproducibility of postexercise ambulatory blood pressure in Stage I hypertension.Journal of human hypertension · 2005Trial
- Influence of the presence of doctors-in-training on the blood pressure of patients: a randomised controlled trial in 22 teaching practices.Journal of human hypertension · 2004Trial
- Twenty-four-hour versus clinic blood pressure levels as predictors of long-term cardiovascular and renal disease outcomes among African Americans.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- MEthods of ASsessing blood pressUre: identifying thReshold and target valuEs (MeasureBP): a review & study protocol.Current hypertension reports · 2015Article
- Hypertension and exposure to noise near airports: the HYENA study.Environmental health perspectives · 2008Article
- Reliability and validity of blood pressure measurement in the Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes study.Blood pressure monitoring · 2007Article
- 'Office-hour' ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is sufficient for blood pressure diagnosis.Journal of human hypertension · 2006Article
- Hypertension and Exposure to Noise near Airports (HYENA): study design and noise exposure assessment.Environmental health perspectives · 2005Article
- The Blood Pressure "Uncertainty Range" - a pragmatic approach to overcome current diagnostic uncertainties (II).Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine · 2005Article
- Goodbye mercury? Blood pressure measurement and its future.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2005Article
- End-digit preference in blood pressure recordings of patients with ischaemic heart disease in primary care.Journal of human hypertension · 2004Article
- Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.Journal of human hypertension · 2003Article
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2003Review
- Blood pressure measurement in epidemiological investigations in teenagers.European journal of epidemiology · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBlood pressure (BP) is usually measured by conventional sphygmomanometry. Although apparently simple, this procedure is fraught with many potential sources of error. This review focuses on two alternative techniques of BP measurement: ambulatory monitoring and self measurement. REVIEW: BP values obtained by ambulatory monitoring or self measurement are characterised by high reproducibility, are not subject to digit preference or observer bias, and minimise the transient rise of the blood pressure in response to the surroundings of the clinic or the presence of the observer, the so called white coat effect. For ambulatory monitoring, the upper limits of systolic/diastolic normotension in adults include 130/80 mm Hg for the 24 hour BP and 135/85 and 120/70 mm Hg for the daytime BP and night time BP, respectively. For the the self measured BP these thresholds include 135/85 mm Hg. Automated BP measurement is most useful to identify patients with white coat hypertension. Whether or not white coat hypertension predisposes to sustained hypertension remains debated. However, outcome is better correlated with the ambulatory BP than with the conventional BP. In patients with white coat hypertension, antihypertensive drugs lower the BP in the clinic, but not the ambulatory BP, and also do not improve prognosis. Ambulatory BP monitoring is also better than conventional BP measurement in assessing the effects of treatment. Ambulatory BP monitoring is necessary to diagnose nocturnal hypertension and is especially indicated in patients with borderline hypertension, elderly patients, pregnant women, patients with treatment resistant hypertension, and also in patients with symptoms suggestive of hypotension.
conclusionsThe newer techniques of BP measurement are now well established in clinical research, for diagnosis in clinical practice, and will increasingly make their appearance in occupational and environmental medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.