Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10896338›Full record

ReviewDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology1999

Regulators of vascular permeability: potential sites for intervention in the treatment of macular edema.

M C Gillies

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiation Retinopathy: Detection and Management Strategies.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Cystoid macular edema in uveitis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M C GilliesSave Sight Institute, Sydney University, Australia. mark@eye.usyd.edu.au
Vision Eye Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rather than being a non-specific reaction to a noxious stimulus, breakdown of the capillary blood-retinal barrier causing macular edema appears to be dependent on a number of active processes which may be open to pharmacological manipulation. Extracellular influences which may affect barrier function include serum and neighboring cell types, which act though cytokines, such as vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta, and other factors. A number of intracellular pathways acting on the cytoskeleton and components of the intercellular junctional complexes have been identified which mediate agonist-induced leak of the vascular endothelium. The further elucidation of these processes may be useful in the development of better treatments for breakdown of the inner blood-retinal barrier.

Indexed as

Blood-Retinal BarrierCapillary PermeabilityAnimalsEndothelium, VascularHumansMacular EdemaPhosphorylationProtein Kinase CSignal TransductionTyrosineProtein Kinase CTyrosine

Identifiers

PMID10896338
OpenAlexW1565997452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.