Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10890922›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2000

Changes in brain cell shape create residual extracellular space volume and explain tortuosity behavior during osmotic challenge.

K C Chen, C Nicholson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Strategies to enhance the distribution of nanotherapeutics in the brain.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. A 3D model-based simulation of demyelination to understand its effects on diffusion tensor imaging.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K C ChenDepartment of Physiology and Neuroscience, New York University Medical School, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
C Nicholson

Funding

DIFFUSION OF SUBSTANCES THROUGH THE BRAINR01NS028642 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI NICHOLSON, CHARLES · 1990 to 2013
$4.4M
NINDS NIH HHS NS 28642NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS028642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion of molecules in brain extracellular space is constrained by two macroscopic parameters, tortuosity factor lambda and volume fraction alpha. Recent studies in brain slices show that when osmolarity is reduced, lambda increases while alpha decreases. In contrast, with increased osmolarity, alpha increases, but lambda attains a plateau. Using homogenization theory and a variety of lattice models, we found that the plateau behavior of lambda can be explained if the shape of brain cells changes nonuniformly during the shrinking or swelling induced by osmotic challenge. The nonuniform cellular shrinkage creates residual extracellular space that temporarily traps diffusing molecules, thus impeding the macroscopic diffusion. The paper also discusses the definition of tortuosity and its independence of the measurement frame of reference.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCell SizeExtracellular SpaceModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalNumerical Analysis, Computer-AssistedOsmosis

Identifiers

PMID10890922
PMCPMC26943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.