ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia1996
Genetic analysis of breast cancer progression.
Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling the effect of tumor size in early breast cancer.Annals of surgery · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
At the histological level, breast tumors display a variety of morphologic lesions which suggest the existence of an increasingly aberrant pathway of intermediate steps leading to the invasive primary tumor and its metastatic dissemination. In order to obtain direct evidence for this presumed progression, underlying genetic changes must be identified. Analyses of primary breast tumors have revealed a large number of dominant and recessive gene alterations encompassing several cellular attributes and activities. It is quite likely that some of these alterations are of a causal nature and thus enable the tumor to attain distinctive malignant phenotypes, such as, dysregulated proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and ability to metastasize. Considerable heterogeneity has been observed in the sequence of acquisition of these genetic changes, which is substantiated by recent comparative analyses between carefully microdissected preinvasive and invasive tumor. The data are evaluated here in the context of existing models of breast cancer progression. Implication and prospects for translational application to the clinic are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.