Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10887383›Full record

ArticleSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2000

Environmental tobacco smoke exposure among non-smoking waiters: measurement of expired carbon monoxide levels.

R Laranjeira, S Pillon, J Dunn

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Quantification of ETS exposure in hospitality workers who have never smoked.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2010
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R LaranjeiraUNIAD - Alcohol and drugs research unit, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil.
S Pillon
J Dunn
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextExposure to environmental tobacco smoke is a health risk that is of concern to patrons and of particular concern to employees of restaurants and bars.

objectiveTo assess environmental tobacco smoke exposure (using expired carbon monoxide levels) in non-smoking waiters before and after a normal day's shift and to compare pre-exposure levels with non-smoking medical students.

designAn observational study.

settingRestaurants with more than 50 tables or 100 places in São Paulo. SUBJECTS: 100 non-smoking restaurant waiters and 100 non-smoking medical students in São Paulo, Brazil. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Levels of expired carbon monoxide, measured with a Smokerlyser (Bedfont EC 50 Scientific), before and after a normal day's work.

resultsWaiters' pre-exposure expired carbon monoxide levels were similar to those of medical students, but after a mean of 9 hours exposure in the workplace, median levels more than doubled (2.0 ppm vs. 5.0 ppm, P <0.001). Post-exposure carbon monoxide levels were correlated with the number of tables available for smokers (Kendall's tau = 0.2, P <0.0001).

conclusionsExposure to environmental tobacco smoke is the most likely explanation for the increase in carbon monoxide levels among these non-smoking waiters. These findings can be used to inform the ongoing public health debate on passive smoking.

Indexed as

RestaurantsAdolescentAdultBreath TestsCarbon MonoxideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureStatistics, NonparametricStudents, MedicalTobacco Smoke PollutionWorkplaceCarbon MonoxideTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID10887383
PMCPMC11173293
OpenAlexW1980403515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.