Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10886474›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2000

Blood cholesterol screening influence of fasting state on cholesterol results and management decisions.

S R Craig, R V Amin, D W Russell, N F Paradise

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00287404 (A Comparison of NMR and Chemical Lipid Analysis in the Fasting and Postprandial State in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00287404 completednot on this mapstarted 2005, after this paper: background citation

A Comparison of NMR and Chemical Lipid Analysis in the Fasting and Postprandial State in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of North CarolinaRan2005 to 2006Enrolled30ConditionsType 2 Diabetes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reduced circulating CD63Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cardiovascular Health in St. Louis Bosnian-Americans.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Maternal serum markers of lipid metabolism in relation to neonatal anthropometry.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S R CraigUniversity of Iowa-Des Moines Internal Medicine Residency Program, Iowa Methodist Medical Center, Des Moines, USA. craigs@ihs.org
R V Amin
D W Russell
N F Paradise

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare fasting and nonfasting total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol values in adults and to determine how closely classification into risk groups for coronary heart disease based on nonfasting blood tests compares with classification based on fasting studies.

designCross-sectional study.

settingA community hospital general internal medicine clinic. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-one patients at least 20 years of age receiving medical care at a community hospital general internal medicine clinic.

interventionsTotal and HDL cholesterol levels were measured twice in each patient within 7 days, once while not fasting and once after a minimum 12-hour fast. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsFasting and nonfasting total and HDL cholesterol values were compared, patients were classified into desirable, borderline-high, and high cholesterol groups on the basis of fasting and nonfasting blood studies. There were small, statistically significant but clinically insignificant differences in fasting and nonfasting results for total cholesterol. Nonfasting HDL cholesterol levels were similar to fasting HDL levels. The agreement in classification of patients into desirable and high-cholesterol groups between fasting and non-fasting blood testing was 86.7% and 89.5%, respectively. In the borderline-high group, for whom levels of HDL cholesterol are important in determining subsequent management, there was 95% agreement between fasting and nonfasting HDL cholesterol results. Only a small fraction of the patients were classified into lower-risk groups by the nonfasting assessment, creating the potential for less-rigorous monitoring and treatment of their cholesterol status than if fasting results were utilized. These findings were confirmed in this study also for the subgroups of men aged 35 years and older and women aged 45 years and older.

conclusionsScreening nonfasting adults for total and HDL cholesterol is appropriate for making decisions about primary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCholesterol, HDLCoronary DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFastingFemaleHumansLipoproteinsMaleMiddle AgedCholesterol, HDLLipoproteins

Identifiers

PMID10886474
PMCPMC1495473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.