Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2000
Cervical cancer screening in the urgent care setting.
Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Among US Hispanics/Latinas: A Qualitative Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions that increase use of Pap tests among ethnic minority women: a meta-analysis.Psycho-oncology · 2011Pooled it
- Article
- A case report of lung metastasis in a cervical cancer presenting as a consolidation.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- A Case Report of Advanced Cervical Cancer in a Patient Non-compliant With Age-Appropriate Screening.Cureus · 2022Article
- Predictors of breast and cervical cancer screening among Chamorro women in Southern California.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2010Article
- Article
- Access and care issues in urban urgent care clinic patients.BMC health services research · 2009Article
- Review
- Assessing missed opportunities for HIV testing in medical settings.Journal of general internal medicine · 2004Article
- Overcoming barriers to preventive care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the feasibility of cervical cancer screening in an urgent care clinic.
designProspective randomized trial.
settingPublic teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Women presenting to the urgent care clinic whose evaluation necessitated a pelvic examination were eligible for participation. Women who had a hysterectomy, had a documented Pap test at our institution in the past year, did not speak English or Spanish, or had significant vaginal bleeding were excluded. Women presenting to the gynecology clinic for a scheduled Pap test were used as a comparison group for rates of follow-up, Pap smear adequacy, and Pap smear abnormalities.
interventionsWomen randomized to the intervention group had a Pap test performed as part of their pelvic examination, while women in the usual care group were encouraged to schedule an appointment in the gynecology clinic at a later date. The women in the two groups completed identical questionnaires regarding cervical cancer risk factors and demographic information. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsNinety-four (84.7%) of 111 women in the intervention group received a Pap test, as compared with 25 (29%) of 86 in the usual care group (P <.01). However, only 5 (24%) of 21 women with abnormal Pap smears in the intervention group received follow-up compared with 6 (60%) of 10 women seen during the same time period in the gynecology clinic for self-referred, routine annual examinations (P =.11). Pap smears obtained in the urgent care clinic were similar to those in the gynecology clinic with regard to abnormality rate (22.3% vs 20%; P =.75, respectively) and specimen adequacy (67% vs 72%; P =.54, respectively).
conclusionsUrgent care clinic visits can be used as opportunities to perform Pap test screening in women who are unlikely to adhere to cervical cancer screening recommendations. However, to accrue the full potential benefit from this intervention, an improved process to ensure patient follow-up must be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.