Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10886473›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2000

Cervical cancer screening in the urgent care setting.

H Batal, S Biggerstaff, T Dunn, P S Mehler

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Among US Hispanics/Latinas: A Qualitative Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predictors of breast and cervical cancer screening among Chamorro women in Southern California.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2010
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Overcoming barriers to preventive care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H BatalUrgent Care Clinic at Denver Health and Department of Medicine at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80204, USA. hbatal@dhha.org
S Biggerstaff
T Dunn
P S Mehler
University of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the feasibility of cervical cancer screening in an urgent care clinic.

designProspective randomized trial.

settingPublic teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Women presenting to the urgent care clinic whose evaluation necessitated a pelvic examination were eligible for participation. Women who had a hysterectomy, had a documented Pap test at our institution in the past year, did not speak English or Spanish, or had significant vaginal bleeding were excluded. Women presenting to the gynecology clinic for a scheduled Pap test were used as a comparison group for rates of follow-up, Pap smear adequacy, and Pap smear abnormalities.

interventionsWomen randomized to the intervention group had a Pap test performed as part of their pelvic examination, while women in the usual care group were encouraged to schedule an appointment in the gynecology clinic at a later date. The women in the two groups completed identical questionnaires regarding cervical cancer risk factors and demographic information. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsNinety-four (84.7%) of 111 women in the intervention group received a Pap test, as compared with 25 (29%) of 86 in the usual care group (P <.01). However, only 5 (24%) of 21 women with abnormal Pap smears in the intervention group received follow-up compared with 6 (60%) of 10 women seen during the same time period in the gynecology clinic for self-referred, routine annual examinations (P =.11). Pap smears obtained in the urgent care clinic were similar to those in the gynecology clinic with regard to abnormality rate (22.3% vs 20%; P =.75, respectively) and specimen adequacy (67% vs 72%; P =.54, respectively).

conclusionsUrgent care clinic visits can be used as opportunities to perform Pap test screening in women who are unlikely to adhere to cervical cancer screening recommendations. However, to accrue the full potential benefit from this intervention, an improved process to ensure patient follow-up must be developed.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningOutpatient Clinics, HospitalAdolescentAdultAgedColoradoEmergency TreatmentFeasibility StudiesFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID10886473
PMCPMC1495471
OpenAlexW1982160021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.