Statistical approaches to gene mapping.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Convergent evidence for the molecular basis of musical traits.Scientific reports · 2016
   Review
2. Imaging phenotypes and genotypes in schizophrenia.Neuroinformatics · 2006
   Review
3. PowerTrim: An automated decision support algorithm for preprocessing family-based genetic data.American journal of human genetics · 2003
   Article
4. What we know about the genetics of asthma at the beginning of the 21st century.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2002
   Review
5. Manic-depression genes and the new millennium: poised for discovery.Molecular psychiatry · 2002
   Review
6. Multipoint linkage-disequilibrium-mapping approach based on the case-parent trio design.American journal of human genetics · 2001
   Article
7. Genetics of schizophrenia and the new millennium: progress and pitfalls.American journal of human genetics · 2001
   Review
8. All LODs are not created equal.American journal of human genetics · 2000
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  All LODs are not created equal.2000

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as