Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10880485›Full record

ArticleGenetics2000

Nucleotide polymorphism at the RpII215 gene in Drosophila subobscura. Weak selection on synonymous mutations.

A Llopart, M Aguadé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dense gene physical maps of the non-model species Drosophila subobscura.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A LlopartDepartament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08071 Barcelona, Spain. allopart@midway.uchicago.edu
M Aguadé

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleotide variation in an 8.1-kb fragment encompassing the RpII215 gene, which encodes the largest subunit of the RNA polymerase II complex, is analyzed in a sample of 11 chromosomes from a natural population of Drosophila subobscura. No amino acid polymorphism was detected among the 157 segregating sites. The observed numbers of preferred and unpreferred derived synonymous mutations can be explained by neutral mutational processes. In contrast, preferred mutations segregate at significantly higher frequency than unpreferred mutations, suggesting the action of natural selection. The polymorphism to divergence ratio is different for preferred and unpreferred changes, in agreement with their beneficial and deleterious effects on fitness, respectively. Preferred and unpreferred codons are nonrandomly distributed in the RpII215 gene, leading to a heterogeneous distribution of polymorphic to fixed synonymous differences across this coding region. This intragenic variation of the polymorphism/divergence ratio cannot be explained by different patterns of gene expression, mutation, or recombination rates, and therefore it indicates that selection coefficients for synonymous mutations can vary extensively across a coding region. The application of nucleotide composition stationarity tests in coding and flanking noncoding regions, assumed to behave neutrally, allows the detection of the action of natural selection when stationarity holds in the noncoding region.

Indexed as

MutationSelection, GeneticAnimalsChromosome InversionCodonDNA Mutational AnalysisDrosophilaFemaleGene ExpressionGenetic VariationInsect ProteinsMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, GeneticRecombination, GeneticCodonInsect ProteinsRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID10880485
PMCPMC1461163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.