ArticleGenetics2000
Nucleotide polymorphism at the RpII215 gene in Drosophila subobscura. Weak selection on synonymous mutations.
Article in Genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The molecular genealogy of sequential overlapping inversions implies both homologous chromosomes of a heterokaryotype in an inversion origin.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Dense gene physical maps of the non-model species Drosophila subobscura.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2017Article
- Molecular evidence to suggest the origin of a colonization: Drosophila subobscura in America.Genetica · 2011Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Selective and mutational patterns associated with gene expression in humans: influences on synonymous composition and intron presence.Genetics · 2004Article
- The correlation between intron length and recombination in drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces.Genetics · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nucleotide variation in an 8.1-kb fragment encompassing the RpII215 gene, which encodes the largest subunit of the RNA polymerase II complex, is analyzed in a sample of 11 chromosomes from a natural population of Drosophila subobscura. No amino acid polymorphism was detected among the 157 segregating sites. The observed numbers of preferred and unpreferred derived synonymous mutations can be explained by neutral mutational processes. In contrast, preferred mutations segregate at significantly higher frequency than unpreferred mutations, suggesting the action of natural selection. The polymorphism to divergence ratio is different for preferred and unpreferred changes, in agreement with their beneficial and deleterious effects on fitness, respectively. Preferred and unpreferred codons are nonrandomly distributed in the RpII215 gene, leading to a heterogeneous distribution of polymorphic to fixed synonymous differences across this coding region. This intragenic variation of the polymorphism/divergence ratio cannot be explained by different patterns of gene expression, mutation, or recombination rates, and therefore it indicates that selection coefficients for synonymous mutations can vary extensively across a coding region. The application of nucleotide composition stationarity tests in coding and flanking noncoding regions, assumed to behave neutrally, allows the detection of the action of natural selection when stationarity holds in the noncoding region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.